Carl van Walraven and colleagues recently presented a timely article about the information gaps that impede continuity of care for Canadian patients.1 Both the article and the accompanying commentary2 discussed the potential of electronic health records for facilitating provider-to-provider information sharing. This possibility is becoming a reality as the Canada Health Infoway works to establish interoperable electronic health records for 50% of Canadians by 2010.3
The use of electronic health records may also enhance provider-to-patient communication.4 If these records are made available to patients, either electronically or in print, this technology can improve patients' understanding of their condition or treatment and can enrich the patient self-management approach that is becoming popular in contemporary primary care.5
Adoption of these methods requires a philosophical shift in the way that patient information is conceptualized. Traditionally, patient information has been under the ownership of the provider; sharing health records with the patient transfers much of this ownership to the patient. Although the Supreme Court ruled that patients have the right to access their full medical record,6 a recent survey found that only 17.9% of chief executive officers of Canadian hospitals thought their staff would support partial patient access to electronic health records and only 3.6% thought that their staff would support full patient access to electronic health records.4
Patient demand for self-care options necessitates a reconstruction of the management and use of patient information. The aging of the population and the increase in the prevalence of chronic conditions have brought about an increase in the number of providers involved in a patient's care.3 Emerging technologies such as patient-accessible electronic health records should be considered as a means of facilitating the transmission of information not only between providers but also between provider and patient to address gaps in the continuity of care.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None declared.