Table 2:

Intention-to-treat analysis of the changes from baseline to 12 weeks in the iron and placebo groups

VariableMean change (adjusted)* (SD)Treatment effect, mean change (adjusted), (95% CI)
Iron
n = 102
Placebo
n = 96
Fatigue
Fatigue score (CAPPS; 0–40 points)
 Effect on score−12.2 (10.2)−8.7 (11.7)−3.46 (−6.7 to −0.3)
 Change over time, %−47.7 (35.6)−28.8 (57.1)−18.9 (−34.5 to −3.2)
Global fatigue index (MAF; 0–50 points)
 Effect on score−16.2 (11.8)−11.2 (10.8)−4.0 (−7.6 to −0.4)
 Change over time, %−41.3 (30.5)−30.8 (27.6)−10.5 (−19.2 to −1.9)
Severity index of fatigue (MAF; 0–10 points)
 Effect on score−3.6 (2.5)−2.7 (2.3)−0.87 (−1.5 to −0.08)
 Change over time, %−43.3 (30.1)−33.6 (27.5)−9.7 (−18.1 to −1.2)
Blood characteristics
Hemoglobin, g/dL0.28 (0.79)−0.05 (0.83)0.32 (0.11 to 0.52)
Ferritin, μg/L11.6 (13.7)0.2 (11.0)11.4 (7.5 to 15.3)
Red blood cells, × 1012/L0.01 (0.19)−0.02 (0.21)0.02 (−0.06 to 0.10)
Mean corpuscular volume, fL1.4 (3.5)−0.6 (3.2)1.9 (1.1 to 2.7)
Hematocrit, %0.7 (2.7)−0.4 (2.5)1.0 (0.2 to 1.7)
Transferrin, g/L−0.17 (0.49)0.02 (0.38)−0.15 (−0.3 to −0.05)
Soluble transferrin receptor, mg/L−0.66 (0.69)−0.13 (0.51)−0.54 (−0.8 to −0.28)
Transferrin saturation, %2.8 (14.2)−0.9 (14.1)3.8 (0.1 to 7.6)
Mental disorders (CAPPS; 0–40 points)
Depression−5.0 (6.5)−4.9 (7.4)0.04 (−2.0 to 2.1)
Anxiety−5.5 (9.0)−3.5 (9.1)−2.0 (−4.9 to 0.9)
Quality of life
SF–12 (0–100 points)8.8 (13.4)6.0 (12.9)2.8 (−1.2 to 6.8)
 Physical score, SF–12 (0–50 points)5.4 (8.4)3.1 (6.8)2.3 (−0.4 to 5.0)
 Mental score, SF–12 (0–50 points)3.5 (8.6)2.7 (8.4)0.7 (−1.2 to 2.6)
CAPPS total score, (0–120 points)−21.3 (20.5)−16.9 (21.4)−4.4 (−11.2 to 2.4)
  • Note: CAPPS = Current and Past Psychological Scale, CI = confidence interval, MAF = multidimensional assessment of fatigue scale, SD = standard deviation, SF-12 = short form Self-Reported Health Questionnaire.

  • * Mean differences between baseline and 12 weeks were adjusted for clustering effects at the physician level.

  • Iron = prolonged-release ferrous sulfate (FeSO4).

  • Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate the average least-squares mean between groups adjusted for baseline values and the clustering effect between physicians. A hot-deck method with 10 imputations was used to account for data that were missing and lost to follow-up.