Table 3:

Diagnostic accuracy of each test for ulnar and radial arteries

ParameterExamined using the modified Allen testExamined using the heart rate–monitoring applicationp value
Ulnar artery assessment, n = 736
 No. (%) of positive test results*126 (17.1)49 (6.7)< 0.001
 Overall diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI)84.0 (79.1 to 87.9)92.1 (88.7 to 94.6)0.002
 Specificity, % (95% CI)84.6 (79.6 to 88.5)93.3 (90.2 to 95.5)< 0.001
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI)40.0 (14.3 to 72.7)37.5 (12.5 to 71.5)0.9
 Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)2.6 (−0.3 to 5.4)5.6 (0.1 to 11.1)
 Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)0.7 (0.2 to 1.2)0.7 (0.3 to 1.0)
Radial artery assessment, n = 736
 No. (%) of positive test results*102 (13.9)30 (4.1)< 0.001
 Overall diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI)84.0 (76.6 to 87.6)95.9 (93.4 to 97.5)< 0.001
 Specificity, % (95% CI)85.6 (81.1 to 89.1)96.9 (94.6 to 98.3)< 0.001
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI)46.7 (25.4 to 69.2)50.0 (23.1 to 76.9)0.9
 Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)3.2 (1.3 to 5.2)16.4 (1.5 to 31.2)
 Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)0.5 (0.2 to 0.9)
All arteries assessed, n = 1472
 No. (%) of positive test results*228 (15.5)79 (5.4)< 0.001
 Overall diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI)84.0 (79.9 to 87.4)94.0 (91.9 to 95.6)< 0.001
 Specificity, % (95% CI)85.1 (80.9 to 88.5)95.1 (93.2 to 96.6)< 0.001
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI)45.0 (26.4 to 65.2)43.8 (23.9 to 65.9)0.9
 Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)3.0 (1.5 to 4.6)9.0 (3.2 to 17.8)
 Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)0.6 (0.4 to 0.9)0.6 (0.3 to 0.8)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval.

  • * A positive test result indicates that there is inadequate collateral blood flow; this includes all true-positive and false-positive results.

  • Values of p were generated using a generalized estimating equation model for the randomization arm parameter (i.e., modified Allen test versus heart rate–monitoring application) with binomial distribution using a logit link where the outcome was a correct test result.