Table 2:

Factors associated with planned CDMR in Ontario, Canada, between 2012 and 2018*

FactorNo. of pregnancies*
n = 422 210
No. (%) of planned CDMR
n = 1827
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Maternal age, yr
 < 1912 46229 (0.23)0.53 (0.37 to 0.77)
 20–34334 2781140 (0.34)Reference
 35–3963 896459 (0.72)2.11 (1.88 to 2.37)
 ≥ 4011 393195 (1.71)4.33 (3.67 to 5.11)
Neighbourhood family income quintile
 Quintile 1 (lowest)92 362365 (0.40)Reference
 Quintile 276 406288 (0.38)0.94 (0.79 to 1.10)
 Quintile 380 216307 (0.38)0.91 (0.78 to 1.06)
 Quintile 491 771414 (0.45)0.96 (0.83 to 1.11)
 Quintile 5 (highest)57 372332 (0.58)0.93 (0.79 to 1.11)
Neighbourhood education level quintile
 Quintile 1 (lowest)82 632246 (0.30)Reference
 Quintile 288 891306 (0.34)1.06 (0.89 to 1.27)
 Quintile 384 780294 (0.35)1.02 (0.85 to 1.22)
 Quintile 486 618423 (0.49)1.30 (1.10 to 1.54)
 Quintile 5 (highest)58 489449 (0.77)1.78 (1.48 to 2.15)
Maternal race
 White166 531886 (0.53)Reference
 Non-White99 121383 (0.39)0.60 (0.53 to 0.68)
 Missing156 558558 (0.36)0.87 (0.78 to 0.97)
Parity
 0203 4061140 (0.56)2.25 (2.02 to 2.50)
 ≥ 1218 804687 (0.31)Reference
Prepregnancy BMI, kg/m2
 Underweight (< 18.5)24 499123 (0.50)1.24 (0.99 to 1.57)
 Normal weight (18.5 to 24.9)211 790896 (0.42)Reference
 Overweight (25.0 to 29.9)89 491348 (0.39)0.93 (0.81 to 1.07)
 Obese (≥ 30)56 322231 (0.41)1.00 (0.87 to 1.16)
Gestational weight gain§
 Less than recommended100 444336 (0.33)0.88 (0.75 to 1.04)
 Within recommended range81 936333 (0.41)Reference
 More than recommended199 721929 (0.47)1.18 (1.04 to 1.34)
Conception type
 In vitro fertilization5484122 (2.22)2.64 (2.15 to 3.24)
 Intrauterine insemination and other ART567838 (0.67)1.05 (0.75 to 1.45)
 Spontaneous404 2001645 (0.41)Reference
Maternal anxiety**
 No387 6391570 (0.41)Reference
 Yes34 571257 (0.74)2.07 (1.79 to 2.40)
Maternal depression**
 No391 5341676 (0.43)Reference
 Yes30 676151 (0.49)0.97 (0.81 to 1.17)
Attended prenatal class
 No288 3681283 (0.44)Reference
 Yes101 394392 (0.39)0.59 (0.52 to 0.67)
Antenatal health care provider††
 Family physician only54 84960 (0.11)0.21 (0.16 to 0.27)
 Obstetrician only233 4391445 (0.62)Reference
 Family physician and obstetrician58 909234 (0.40)0.72 (0.63 to 0.83)
 Midwife64 42961 (0.09)0.16 (0.13 to 0.21)
 NoneSSS
 Other669419 (0.28)0.48 (0.30 to 0.76)
Maternal hospital level of care‡‡
 Level I56 385134 (0.24)Reference
 Level IIa47 765134 (0.28)0.86 (0.68 to 1.10)
 Level IIb133 875431 (0.32)0.91 (0.75 to 1.12)
 Level IIc108 030629 (0.58)1.57 (1.30 to 1.91)
 Level III76 099499 (0.66)1.51 (1.24 to 1.85)
Infant sex
 Male215 860943 (0.44)Reference
 Female206 101884 (0.43)0.97 (0.89 to 1.07)
Birth weight, g
 < 2500425910 (0.23)0.50 (0.27 to 0.93)
 2500 to 3999368 1531643 (0.45)Reference
 ≥ 400049 782174 (0.35)0.87 (0.74 to 1.02)
  • Note: ART = assisted reproductive technologies, BMI = body mass index, CDMR = cesarean delivery on maternal request, CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

  • * Counts included in table are identical to Table 1 and are based on data before imputation. Row percentages are presented. Adjusted relative risk estimates were calculated using data imputed using fully conditional specification. Numbers are suppressed (S) for small cell sizes (n < 6).

  • A multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios. The multivariate logistic regression model included maternal age, neighbourhood income level, neighourhood education level, race, parity, BMI, gestational weight gain, method of conception, prenatal class attendance, anxiety, depression, antenatal health care provider, maternal hospital level of care, infant sex and infant birth weight. If one independent variable was treated as the main predictor, the other variables were automatically treated as covariates or confounders. C-statistic = 0.746.

  • Percentage of college and university degrees among adults 25–64 years old.

  • § Based on 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations.

  • Self-reported variables.

  • ** Constitute concerns that were pre-existing, diagnosed during pregnancy or active during pregnancy.

  • †† If a woman had a midwife in addition to other health care providers, she was assigned to the midwife group. The assumption was that most of the antenatal care would have been provided by the midwife.

  • ‡‡ Maternal hospital level of care classification based on newborn and maternal needs, risk and illness as defined by The Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health in Ontario.