See also practice article by Mumoli and Cei on page 560 and at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.111256
Community-acquired pneumonia is life-threatening and timely administration of antibiotics is a goal of therapy
In-hospital mortality associated with community-acquired pneumonia is comparable to that with acute myocardial infarction.1 Patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia require urgent assessment and therapy; however, overemphasis on time to first dose of antibiotics may lead to unnecessary administration of antibiotics for noninfectious diseases.2 Because of a lack of convincing evidence, guidelines no longer specify a four-hour window for starting antibiotics for patients who require admission to hospital but instead recommend that the first dose be given in the emergency department.2,3
Pretreatment diagnostic tests should be requested on a case-by-case basis
Routine cultures of blood and sputum are controversial because of their low yield and impact on treatment decisions. These tests are optional for outpatients; however, they should be ordered for patients who require admission to hospital, even in the absence of fever, if there is an increased risk of unusual or resistant pathogens that would require a change of empiric therapy or duration. This includes patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, an immunocompromised state, alcohol abuse, structural lung disease, the presence of a pleural effusion and those who have recently travelled, as well as those for whom outpatient therapy has failed.3
Severe disease requires early recognition and prompt referral to intensive care
Current guidelines recommend early referral to intensive care for patients with hypotension despite aggressive fluid resuscitation, hypothermia, elevated respiratory rate (> 30 breaths/min), PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250, leukopenia [< 4 × 109/L], multilobar consolidation, thrombocytopenia (< 100 × 109/L), confusion or uremia (blood urea nitrogen ≥ 20 mmol/L).3 The presence of three or more of these criteria has recently been validated in a prospective observational trial for predicting need for intensive care.4
Determining who can receive treatment as an outpatient should be guided by validated scoring systems
Predictive scores including the CURB-65 (Confusion, Uremia, Respiratory rate, low Blood pressure, age ≥ 65 years) or Pneumonia Severity Index are useful for identifying those at low risk of death who may be safely cared for as outpatients.3 A patient’s oxygen saturation (Sp02) on room air is increasingly recognized as a stand-alone criterion for discharge decisions. A recent prospective cohort study of 2923 patients with community-acquired pneumonia showed that those discharged from the emergency department with an Sp02 of less than 90% had increased combined 30-day mortality and admission rates (odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1–2.8; p = 0.032).5 When an Sp02 of 92% or greater was used, the association with adverse events was no longer present.
Outpatient therapy should take into account risk factors for drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
Patients with exposure to macrolides, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole or respiratory fluoroquinolones in the past three months are at least four times more likely than those without such exposure to be infected with a pneumococcal isolate that is resistant to the same class of antibiotics.6 Although macrolides are the recommended first-line agents for those treated as outpatients, patients with recent macrolide exposure or who live in regions with high rates of macrolide resistance (> 25%) should receive alternate forms of empiric therapy.3,6 Treatment options include the addition of amoxicillin or amoxicillin–clavulanate or monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone.3
Footnotes
-
This article has been peer reviewed.
-
For references, please see Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.111143/-/DC1
-
Competing interests: None declared.