Research article
Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
An-Wen Chan, Karmela Krleža-Jerić, Isabelle Schmid and Douglas G. Altman
CMAJ September 28, 2004 171 (7) 735-740; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041086
An-Wen Chan
Karmela Krleža-Jerić
Isabelle Schmid
![Loading Loading](https://www.cmaj.ca/sites/all/modules/contrib/panels_ajax_tab/images/loading.gif)
Article Information
vol. 171 no. 7 735-740
PubMed
History
- Published online September 27, 2004.
Copyright & Usage
© 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
Author Information
- An-Wen Chan,
- Karmela Krleža-Jerić,
- Isabelle Schmid,
- Douglas G. Altman
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
An-Wen Chan, Karmela Krleža-Jerić, Isabelle Schmid, Douglas G. Altman
CMAJ Sep 2004, 171 (7) 735-740; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041086
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses
- Exploring the similarities and differences of variables collected by burn registers globally: protocol for a data dictionary review study
- Catalogue of bias: selective outcome reporting bias
- Key Principles for Conducting a Good Randomized Controlled Trial
- From registration, protocol to report: are COVID-19-related RCTs in mainland China consistent? A systematic review of clinical trial registry and literature
- Restoring invisible and abandoned trials of gabapentin for neuropathic pain: a clinical and methodological investigation
- Publication Rate and Consistency of Registered Trials of Motor-Based Stroke Rehabilitation
- Outcome Reporting bias in Exercise Oncology trials (OREO): a cross-sectional study
- A guide to prospective meta-analysis
- Prompt closure versus gradual weaning of extraventricular drainage for hydrocephalus in adult patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review protocol with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
- Compromising Outcomes
- Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care
- Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
- Research waste is still a scandal--an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- Characteristics of Randomized Trials Focusing on Stroke due to Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review
- Canadian funders and institutions are lagging on reporting results of clinical trials
- Publication of interventional phase 3 and 4 clinical trials in radiation oncology: an observational study
- Are outcomes reported in surgical randomized trials patient-important? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
- Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions
- From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- Completeness of main outcomes across randomized trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in preterm infants
- Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
- Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey
- Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis
- "Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- Many Randomized Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions Are Not Adequately Registered: A Survey of 200 Published Trials
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
- Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study
- Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
- Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis
- Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses
- Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
- STAR*D: A Tale and Trail of Bias
- Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
- Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study
- Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses
- The tyranny of power: is there a better way to calculate sample size?
- Reprint--Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
- Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review
- Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- Reporting of radiographic methods in randomised controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis
- The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey
- Oral presentation bias: a retrospective cohort study
- Clinical trial registration at Tobacco Control
- Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study
- Waiving confidentiality for the greater good
- Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study
- Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1)
- Conduct and Reporting of Clinical Research
- Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
- Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs
- Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs
- Trial protocols at the BMJ
- La Cochrane Collaboration a 10 ans : realisations et defis
- Registering CIHR-funded randomized controlled trials: a global public good
- The Cochrane Collaboration at 10: kudos and challenges